Homeworks academic writing service


An argument in favor of the safety of anabolic steroids in the united states

  1. And last summer, several riders were dismissed from the Tour de France on charges of using banned substances.
  2. Those who oppose the use of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs say that the athletes who use them are breaking the rules and getting an unfair advantage over others.
  3. They face a perverse dilemma. US runner Justin Gatlin, for example, has complained that previous doping bans have led to biased and unfair coverage of his performances.
  4. Six experts on steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs recently took on the issue in an Oxford-style debate, part of the series Intelligence Squared U. It is not providing assurances to the public that good performances are clean.

The debate over athletes' use of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs has taken on newfound urgency in recent months. A report by former Sen.

George Mitchell, released in December, mentioned dozens of baseball players as having used steroids and described their use as "widespread. And last summer, several riders were dismissed from the Tour de France on charges of using banned substances. Those who oppose the use of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs say that the athletes who use them are breaking the rules and getting an unfair advantage over others.

Opponents of the drugs say the athletes are endangering not only their own health, but also indirectly encouraging youngsters to do the same. Others maintain that it is hypocritical for society to encourage consumers to seek drugs to treat all sorts of ailments and conditions but to disdain drug use for sports.

They say the risk to athletes has been overstated and that the effort to keep them from using performance-enhancing drugs is bound to fail. Six experts on steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs recently took on the issue in an Oxford-style debate, part of the series Intelligence Squared U.

The debates are modeled on a program begun in London in 2002: Three experts argue in favor of a proposition and three argue against.

  • Those who oppose the use of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs say that the athletes who use them are breaking the rules and getting an unfair advantage over others;
  • They say the risk to athletes has been overstated and that the effort to keep them from using performance-enhancing drugs is bound to fail;
  • If they do that, they face the risk of complete ruin as a scapegoat if they are caught.

In the latest debate, held on Jan. Johnson was stripped of his gold medal in the 1988 Olympics after testing positive for steroids.

Should We Accept Steroid Use in Sports?

In a vote before the debate, 18 percent of audience members supported the motion to accept performance-enhancing drugs in competitive sports, and 63 percent opposed it. Nineteen percent were undecided.

After the debate, 37 percent of audience members agreed with the proposition. Fifty-nine percent opposed it, and 4 percent remained undecided.

Highlights from the debate: I'd suggest it's about paternalism, and it's about control. We have a full-blown moral panic on our hands here, and it's over a set of substances that, for whatever reason, has attracted the ire of the people who have made it their job to tell us what is and isn't good for us.

  • Doping experts Michael Ashenden and Robin Parisotto have evaluated leaked IAAF blood value data, and declared that around of third of medals were won by athletes with suspicious values world championships and Olympics between 2001 and 2012;
  • This is counter-intuitive to many;
  • Testing then focuses not on how those levels were achieved, but on whether they are safe.

Our society has an oddly schizophrenic relationship with pharmaceuticals and medical technology. If something could be said to be natural, we tend to be OK with it. If it's lab-made or synthetic, we tend to be leery. But even synthetic drugs and man-made technology seem to be OK if the aim is to make sick people better or broken people whole again.