Homeworks academic writing service

Types of coaches and styles in coaching in the video good coach bad coach

Some Examples For a coach, the goal, unless you coach both at the elite level and with kids, say, 17 years old or older e. We want them to be the best player they can be somewhere down the road—when they are 17 or 19, say. Sometimes you can do that and also win a lot of games—but not always. Sometimes there are choices.

  1. When solutions do not turn out as expected, a good coach proactively helps to define alternative actions. They make us look good by winning games so we let them become limited and one-dimensional players to keep the wins coming.
  2. Most people would rather work under a manager who behaves as a coach than one who dictates and directs from above.
  3. But even for coaches who say they are about development, there are pitfalls so I am trying to make a short list of some of the key areas where winning and developing players come into conflict.

Generally, this is bad for soccer, and if you think I am just talking about recreational players, I beg to differ. As Xavi put it about Barcelona: They want quality for their kids, but they mistake wins for quality, thus ironically putting pressure on coaches to serve their kids poorly. But even for coaches who say they are about development, there are pitfalls so I am trying to make a short list of some of the key areas where winning and developing players come into conflict.

If you do, though, try to add to it positively and respectfully. For the most part good people trying to do right by kids get these things wrong. Coaching to Develop Players Means: Whether or not Jose Mourinho plays possession and whether a youth team should are very different issues. Sometimes a professional coach chooses a different approach to try to win so when players are nearing the elite level you might want to teach them to counter-attack.

I know a coach who advocates for kids to dribble whenever they can, even into a 1 v 3 situation.

When a player loses the ball he or she effectively distributes touches from his or her team to the other team. Also 2 you want those touches widely distributed across the players on your team.

Non-possession soccer allocates them primarily to just a few players. This essentially means you are only developing some of your players seriously. If you can predictably expect to get the ball if you move into a good position, then you learn to keep doing it. You learn to read the game. Thinking you will and hoping you might are very different. Finally 4 you want players to know and understand the system that is played at elite levels so they can aspire to go as far as they can go.

Possession soccer is the default. Building out of the back Personally I think at least half of GKs and goalie possessions should involve throws in the case of goalie possessionor short distribution.

Backs never touch the ball. Building out of the back, even under pressure sometimes, means this in the short run: You will give up a bad goal. At some point it will cost you a game. But over the long run you will build skill, poise and comfort with the ball among all of your players in a wider variety of high pressure settings. You will teach them to link play. This will allow them to play anywhere on the field and enjoy the game for the rest of their lives. De-emphasizing unsustainable athletic based success.

You probably have a player who is really fast. You can put him on outside.

He can tap the ball by a defender and race forward into space. He can get in on goal. Over time, the premium on his speed will erode. Teams will figure out how to defend pure speed. You need to teach him not to rely on physical prowess now, when it helps you look good, at the cost of his not being able to play a more sophisticated game later.

This situation is endemic. Some of the kids we coach the very worst are the kids who dominate when they are young.

They make us look good by winning games so we let them become limited and one-dimensional players to keep the wins coming. Players playing multiple positions. Players younger than a certain age 14? I was the shortest kid in my class in tenth grade. Besides, the killer app at the elite levels is the defender who can attack and the striker who can defend.

Doug Lemov's field notes

Plus the great majority of coaches spend the great majority of their time coaching on the offensive side of the ball, a top coach once said. Should they shift how much coaching of defense they do?

But they should also shift kids so they learn all of the skills in the game. I get that specialization has to happen at elite levels. I just think it happens way too completely and too early at the non-elite levels.

Quiet and ego-less coaches. A coach should be calm and composed in teaching or reinforcing during a game so players can be calm and composed in executing. When you bring your emotions into it you add one more variable that distracts the player from thinking about his or her own execution. Why is he shouting at me? Does he shout at everyone like this? Am i being picked on? Does he think the goal was my fault?

He never yells at Danny. When we coach demonstratively and we win, it looks like maybe it was all that dramatic coaching stuff that won the game. Do some coaches worry that if they win and appear from the sidelines to have done almost nothing, if they did all their work in advance, say, it might not be clear to parents and observers that their coaching helped cause the win?

She stayed behind the defense, yards up field, got three or four release passes and scored two. Her team won 2-1. What a brilliant bit of coaching! Reinforcing decision-making over outcome: Making the right decision with an imperfect touch is often a good thing… at least as good as a good touch with a bad decision.

In the end, the decision-making is probably harder to learn than the touch. We have to remember that kids are going to try it a bunch of times and get it wrong before they try it and get it right. When it happens, make sure to reinforce the good parts. What else should be on it??? If you scroll down in the blog you can see the metrics they use to help assess their own effectiveness at playing possession oriented soccer and how diligent they are about collecting them.

Just sharing such data w parents would help them to see the difference between winning 2-1 and winning 2-1 while earning their kids twice as many touches per game. Only thing I would consider adding to their metrics is percentage of goalie possessions punted vs thrown or some other measure of building out of the back.

Anyway I thought it was a great example of walking the player development walk, not just talking the talk or not even bothering to talk the talk.