Homeworks academic writing service


The effects of rage in hamlet by william shakespeare

Bring fact-checked results to the top of your browser search. Sometimes he used old stories Hamlet, Pericles. Sometimes he worked from the stories of comparatively recent Italian writers, such as Giovanni Boccaccio —using both well-known stories Romeo and Juliet, Much Ado About Nothing and little-known ones Othello.

Some plays deal with rather remote and legendary history King Lear, Cymbeline, Macbeth. Earlier dramatists had occasionally used the same material there were, for example, the earlier plays called The Famous Victories of Henry the Fifth and King Leir.

Shakespeare was probably too busy for prolonged study. He had to read what books he could, when he needed them. His enormous vocabulary could only be derived from a mind of great celerity, responding to the literary as well as the spoken language.

Understanding Shakespeare

It is not known what libraries were available to him. The Huguenot family of Mountjoys, with whom he lodged in London, presumably possessed French books. Moreover, he seems to have enjoyed an interesting connection with the London book trade.

There is no direct evidence of any close friendship between Field and Shakespeare. Clearly, a considerable number of literary contacts were available to Shakespeare, and many books were accessible. An interesting contemporary description of a performance is to be found in the diary of a young lawyer of the Middle Temple, John Manningham, who kept a record of his experiences in 1602 and 1603. On February 2, 1602, he wrote: The Roman plays, in particular, gave evidence of careful reconstruction of the ancient world.

  • Some plays deal with rather remote and legendary history King Lear, Cymbeline, Macbeth;
  • Ben Jonson, who knew him well, contributed verses to the First Folio of 1623, where as elsewhere he criticizes and praises Shakespeare as the author;
  • It is not known what libraries were available to him.

These earlier collections have been superseded by a seven-volume version edited by Geoffrey Bullough as Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare 1957—72. He achieved compression and economy by the exclusion of undramatic material. And everywhere an intensification of the dialogue and an altogether higher level of imaginative writing transformed the older work.

But, quite apart from evidence of the sources of his plays, it is not difficult to get a fair impression of Shakespeare as a reader, feeding his own imagination by a moderate acquaintance with the literary achievements of other men and of other ages.

He was acutely aware of the varieties of poetic style that characterized the work of other authors. A brilliant little poem he composed for Prince Hamlet Act V, scene 2, line 115 shows how ironically he perceived the qualities of poetry in the last years of the 16th century, when poets such as John Donne were writing love poems uniting astronomical and cosmogenic imagery with skepticism and moral paradoxes.

His works show a pervasive familiarity with the passages appointed to be read in church on each Sunday throughout the year, and a large number of allusions to passages in Ecclesiasticus Wisdom of Jesus the Son of Sirach indicates a personal interest in one of the deuterocanonical books. He was widely known by the leading writers of his time as well, including Ben Jonson and John Websterboth of whom praised him as a dramatist.

Many other tributes to him as a great writer appeared during his lifetime. Yet suspicions on the subject gained increasing force in the mid-19th century. Albans, who was indeed a prominent writer of the Elizabethan era. What had prompted this theory? Friedman learned cryptanalysis while investigating the hypothesis that Sir Francis Bacon wrote the plays of William Shakespeare; encoded clues in the printed text supposedly proved Bacon's authorship.

By the 19th century, a university education was becoming more and more the mark of a broadly educated person, but university training in the 16th century was quite a different matter.

The effects of rage in hamlet by william shakespeare notion that only a university-educated person could write of life at court and among the gentry is an erroneous and indeed a snobbish assumption. Shakespeare was better off going to London as he did, seeing and writing plays, listening to how people talked. He was a reporter, in effect. The great writers of his era or indeed of most eras are not usually aristocrats, who have no need to earn a living by their pens.

Edmund Spenser went to Cambridge, it is true, but he came from a sail-making family. Christopher Marlowe also attended Cambridge, but his kindred were shoemakers in Canterbury.

They discovered that they were writers, able to make a living off their talent, and they excluding the poet Spenser flocked to the London theatres where customers for their wares were to be found. Like them, Shakespeare was a man of the commercial theatre.

Other candidates— William Stanley6th earl of Derby, and Christopher Marlowe among them—have been proposed, and indeed the very fact of so many candidates makes one suspicious of the claims of any one person. Oxford did indeed write verse, as did other gentlemen; sonneteering was a mark of gentlemanly distinction. Oxford was also a wretched man who abused his wife and drove his father-in-law to distraction. The chronology presented here, summarizing perhaps 200 years of assiduous scholarship, establishes a professional career for Shakespeare as dramatist that extends from about 1589 to 1614.

Many of his greatest plays—King Lear, Antony and Cleopatra, and The Tempest, to name but three—were written after 1604. To suppose that the dating of the canon is totally out of whack and the effects of rage in hamlet by william shakespeare all the plays and poems were written before 1604 is a desperate argument. Some individual dates are uncertain, but the overall pattern is coherent. The growth in poetic and dramatic styles, the development of themes and subjects, along with objective evidence, all support a chronology that extends to about 1614.

To suppose alternatively that Oxford wrote the plays and poems before 1604 and then put them away in a drawer, to be brought out after his death and updated to make them appear timely, is to invent an answer to a nonexistent problem.

When all is said, the sensible question one must ask is, why would Oxford want to write the plays and poems and then not claim them for himself? The answer given is that he was an aristocrat and that writing for the theatre was not elegant; hence he needed a front man, an alias.

Shakespeare, the actor, was a suitable choice. But is it plausible that a cover-up like this could have succeeded? Ben Jonson, who knew him well, contributed verses to the First Folio of 1623, where as elsewhere he criticizes and praises Shakespeare as the author.

John Heminge and Henry Condellfellow actors and theatre owners with Shakespeare, signed the dedication and a foreword to the First Folio and described their methods as editors.

Book Review : Hamlet : By William Shakespeare

In his own day, therefore, he was accepted as the author of the plays. Unsupported assertions that the author of the plays was a man of great learning and that Shakespeare of Stratford was an illiterate rustic no longer carry weight, and only when a believer in Bacon or Oxford or Marlowe produces sound evidence will scholars pay close attention.

Linguistic, historical, textual, and editorial problems Since the days of Shakespeare, the English language has changed, and so have audiences, theatres, actors, and customary patterns of thought and feeling. Time has placed an ever-increasing cloud before the mirror he held up to life, and it is here that scholarship can help. Elizabethan English pronunciationHear the original pronunciation of Elizabethan English as demonstrated and explained by British linguist David Crystal and his actor son, Ben Crystal.

Actors at the rebuilt Globe Theatre, London, have used this pronunciation in performances of William Shakespeare's plays. Syntax was often different, and, far more difficult to define, so was response to metre and phrase.

What sounds formal and stiff to a modern hearer might have sounded fresh and gay to an Elizabethan. Ideas have changed, too, most obviously political ones. Most of them would have agreed that a man should be burned for ultimate religious heresies. Even if the printer received a good manuscript, small errors could still be introduced. Even the correction of proof sheets in the printing house could further corrupt the text, since such correction was usually effected without reference to the author or to the manuscript copy; when both corrected and uncorrected states are still available, it is sometimes the uncorrected version that is preferable.

Correctors are responsible for some errors now impossible to right.